We begin our research by gathering a wide range of information from sources including scientific journals, brand-provided details and marketing, third-party lab results, and user reviews. We also review brand marketing materials to understand product positioning and user perceptions, adding context to our evaluation. This comprehensive approach ensures that we account for multiple perspectives on each product.
Our evaluations rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies where possible, utilizing metrics like PDCAAS and protein efficiency ratios to validate ingredient effectiveness and bioavailability. For common ingredients, we draw on extensive existing knowledge of scientific research; for newer or unique ingredients, we consult published studies to assess suitability. We also avoid relying on anecdotal evidence, unless it is overwhelmingly consistent across multiple sources.
To ensure accuracy, we cross-check data from various sources, including brand websites, product labels, and independent testing reports. We also analyze the composition of protein powders to align with their marketed goals, helping to eliminate ambiguity and bias. This step is crucial for verifying product claims and maintaining the credibility of our reviews.
We consider the recommended retail price and typical online pricing across multiple stores, acknowledging that sale prices can vary. We use a comparative metric for pricing to maintain fairness without listing specific prices, which avoids conflicts with affiliate agreements.
We maintain independence throughout our analysis process by not relying solely on brand-provided information. We do not endorse any specific brand, and our commissions from affiliate sales do not vary between products, ensuring that our reviews remain unbiased.
AI is a tool that supports our process by aiding with calculations, content editing, consistency checks, watchlist ingredient identification, and minor research tasks. AI is also used to extract data from product labels and images. This allows us more time to focus on pure research, analysis, and writing in-depth content.
We routinely update our reviews as new information becomes available, whether it’s updated formulations, new ingredients, pricing, or fresh user feedback. This dynamic approach ensures our assessments remain current and relevant. We also reevaluate our testing matrix and introduce new metrics and tools to provide improvements to testing procedures and comparisons between products.
Our research is guided by real-world user needs, prioritizing factors like digestibility, effectiveness for different goals, and ingredient transparency, which matter most to users seeking protein supplementation. We also account for taste, texture, and mixability, as personal experiences can significantly affect user satisfaction.
This comprehensive approach allows us to deliver honest, detailed, and helpful protein powder reviews tailored to the needs of our readers. We’re committed to continual updates and improvements to our methodology to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.
When it comes to evaluating protein powders, we aim to be as thorough as possible, but there are some things we can't do.
While we do consult with professionals for content on this site, this is not a substitute for personal medical advice. You should check with a medical professional before taking a supplement or making a significant change to your diet.
Few brands provide amino acid profile breakdowns and they tend to vary between batches anyway. While we applaud this transparency, the data isn't consistent enough to be used for a comparative review. However, we consider the typical amino acid profiles of the protein sources used in a product, their strengths and weaknesses, and the benefits of combining certain sources to support goals.
We don't perform additional 3rd party lab tests for impurities or contaminants. Most brands already use 3rd party testing for quality control. There are also sites such as Labdoor that just perform 3rd party testing for consumers. We do however take into account publically available results where available.